Oh well - good to know that there are at least two other people who thought of it the same way. The fact that it can very much be interpreted as non-romantic male bonding is what makes it more interesting, I think.
Ros dude, chill! Let me bite your flame-bait a bit. Where did you detect the thrill? I can tell you for sure - 99.99999% Indians do not care if a firangi refers to India whether it is consequentially or inconsequentially! If the rest 11479 people do, well they are free to say so. After all it is a free country out here unlike our neighbor on the other side of Tibet :)
It is the relaxed tone of the voice and the blatant playing to the media (for eg: the directions to set fire to the media-watched side of the Taj) that is most unsettling - almost unreal!
@RC: 'Proof' hardly matters in international relations. It is pretty much 'jiski laathi uski bhains'! We have to learn to wield a bigger stick. I do seriously doubt though whether we even have a stick big enough right now!
"Plum" the depths. Some poor subeditor is going to pay.
Danny Boyle caught the pulse of Bombay, the city that he feels territorial about because he believes it is his domain in the imagination.
I don't think Boyle caught the pulse of Bombay. It feels more like a tourist's first impression. Not that Rushdie was any better in
Moor's Last Sigh. His sermon from Malabar Hill even managed to get its solitary marathi line completely wrong.
Sacred Games and
Love and Longing in Bombay do (among other things) the pulse of Bombay biz much better than both.
and the Amitabh Bachchan moment nothing short of inspired
Hmm. I thought it was the weakest moment. A kid jumping in pool of excrement to escape Nazi murderers is believable. This one feels like a stretch. Many real slum dwellers had similar WTF reaction to that scene (will find link if I get a chance).
A well deserved zhapad. Much better than the typical thin-skinned desi response. Almost feels like part 2 of his essay on Attenborough's Gandhi. Salmanbhai is in top form here.
...an opulently photographed movie about extreme poverty...
I would suggest that Peter Jackson's Lord of the Rings films surpass Tolkien's originals, because, to be blunt, Jackson makes films better than Tolkien writes;...
With all that gyan, I wonder why he chose Deepa Mehta for his book. Hope it works out.
Is there a more over-rated actor than Sean Penn? Aside from Dead Man Walking (which owed more to Susan Sarandon’s performance), I can’t stand watching him in anything he does.
I don't know man. I liked him in
Sweet and Lowdown.
I will be happy if In Bruges gets some love.
beggar kids are no longer purposely mutilated...
Maybe the numbers have gone down. But I actually know of one such case (a relative works at NGO for prisoner rehab). It's much more gruesome than Slumdog. The &%@# are behind the bars now.
And some western dresses are dowdy as fcuk.
It’s time that started getting discussed, instead of merely making it look like India is ‘impotent’, much as it seems that way.
Given our options this is true. But it is also equally true that it is our impotence that forces us to choose from these options. Options have to be created by years, if not decades of political and military effort, overt as well as covert. We have been too pacifist - which in our case, is just another word for lazy and corrupt. The snake that doesn't even hiss gets stepped on!
Also there is no point comparing us with
Israel and pointing out US hypocrisy. As if there was ever something other than self-interest at play in international politics! The sooner we get our act together in actively protecting and promoting ours, the better.
The regulation probably would not happen anyway - I trust our legislators to be lazy and divided enough. The Indira era censorship was forced down from the very top. No politician in sight wields that kind of power anymore. With dozen MP regional political parties often holding the keys to power, the central govt itself is in no position today to force such things down the throats of the states. But all the talk about regulation could be, I think, good for it might force the news channels to self-regulate. The threats of regulation are, in this case, a part of trying to find the right balance. And no, we can't let market inefficiencies wreak havoc in matters of national security.